Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty stated that the Assembly of First Nations delivered a clear message to her government regarding the elimination of the second-generation cut-off in the Indian Act. However, she emphasized that any changes in this regard will only be considered after extensive consultations with leaders.
During a recent special assembly in Ottawa, First Nations chiefs voted in favor of supporting Senate amendments to a government bill aimed at widening eligibility under the Indian Act by abolishing the second-generation cut-off. This provision currently bars individuals from registering for status under the law if both their parent and grandparent did not hold status.
The resolution, passed unanimously during the Assembly of First Nations gathering, also urged Ottawa to commit to increased funding to assist communities in accommodating new members.
The AFN functions as an advocacy group for 600 First Nations chiefs who convene biannually to address issues and pass resolutions guiding the executive committee’s lobbying efforts. While all chiefs have the opportunity to attend these gatherings, some, like those from Alberta, lack regional representation on the AFN executive committee.
Mi’kmaw Liberal MP Jaime Battiste highlighted the necessity for the government to secure support from First Nations, facilitated through the AFN, for any proposed changes to the Indian Act.
Several resolutions from past AFN meetings have similarly called for the removal of the second-generation cut-off. Minister Gull-Masty acknowledged her obligation to consult with chiefs and explore alternative suggestions following discussions at the recent AFN assembly.
The Senate introduced Bill S-2, endorsed by the Liberal government, to address gender disparities in the Indian Act and potentially grant Indian status to around 6,000 individuals. Senators amended the bill to eliminate the second-generation cut-off, originating from a 1985 amendment to the Indian Act.
Chiefs expressed concerns that the cut-off could jeopardize their communities’ recognized status in the future, rendering them devoid of federally acknowledged members. Gull Bay First Nation Chief Wilfred King emphasized that those who stand to gain eligibility post-cut-off are integral members of their communities and not strangers.
Minister Gull-Masty underscored her view that the Senate should not modify legislation without House of Commons involvement and prior consultations with First Nations. She acknowledged the apprehensions chiefs have with the current law, given the federal government’s control over Indigenous peoples’ lives.
Senator Paul Prosper, involved in amending the legislation, conveyed witness testimonies supporting the repeal of the second-generation cut-off. He noted concerns about the financial implications of expanding status eligibility, as increased federal recognition would necessitate higher per-capita funding for First Nations.
The discussions and resolutions at the AFN assembly underscore the ongoing dialogue and collaboration between Indigenous leaders and the government on critical issues such as the Indian Act’s second-generation cut-off.