The president of a group representing Indigenous communities in British Columbia’s North Coast has firmly rejected any endorsement for a proposed bitumen pipeline from Alberta’s premier. Danielle Smith recently revealed that Alberta is spearheading efforts to advance a pipeline project to B.C.’s northwest coast by submitting applications to the federal Major Projects Office, citing national interest.
Nonetheless, the pipeline initiative lacks private sector support and encounters significant obstacles due to a ban on oil tankers in northern B.C. and strong opposition from local First Nations. Despite claims by Conservative figures and business entities advocating for the pipeline in B.C., Marilyn Slett, the president of the Coastal First Nations-Great Bear Initiative and chief of the Heiltsuk First Nation, opposes the project, warning of potential ecological devastation along the northern coast.
Slett referenced a 2016 oil spill as a key factor leading to the tanker moratorium. The spill by the Nathan E. Stewart tugboat discharged 110,000 liters of diesel and heavy oils near Bella Bella in Heiltsuk territories, with lasting detrimental effects on the area. She emphasized the catastrophic impact a major crude oil tanker would have on the coastline.
Her stance is echoed by B.C. Premier David Eby and the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, who have also come out against Smith’s pipeline proposal. UBCIC Grand Chief Stewart Phillip labeled the project as an infringement on the constitutionally protected rights of Indigenous communities in British Columbia.
Furthermore, B.C. Green Party MLA Jeremy Valeriote criticized the focus on fossil fuels for economic growth, advocating for a shift towards renewable energy sources. He emphasized the need to prioritize sustainable energy solutions over outdated oil-based ventures.
Although some pro-business factions in B.C. view the pipeline as beneficial for the provincial and national economy, opposition from various political and Indigenous leaders persists. The proposal remains contentious, with differing perspectives on its economic viability and environmental impact.